Methane Wars: A Fable — Chapter Twenty

End Game

good cow wordpressEmboldened by his success, Esposito went after the remaining population he considered a burden on society: the homeless. The homeless weren’t considered unemployed by the PCA because they weren’t on unemployment assistance or any other assistance. They had simply slipped through the cracks, intentionally or unintentionally.

Esposito argued that society had failed them and so society needed to take care of them. And government was the face of society. Esposito commissioned a study to determine the suitability of the homeless population to work. The answer came back that nearly 80% were considered unemployable. That was OK. Esposito had expected as much. The plan was to screen the homeless for those who could work. Those who could work were assigned to The Contract and provided state-supported housing.

The remainder would be given state supported housing, or Homenet. Handlers from the unemployment rolls would be assigned to the formerly homeless to make sure they had what they needed. Better the state take care of them than to allow them to become a burden to society and individuals. Everyone would be taken care of.

On the same day the Homenet bill was passed in the senate the PCA announced its first Five Year Plan to target key industries that could benefit from the creation of one of PCA’s quasi-private companies. The Plan included a list of trades and skills necessary for those industries. Training for those skills would be introduced into high schools and colleges with quotas. Planning for needed skills was far more effective and cost-efficient than training on the fly.

Millions of people found their way onto the government workforce. Hundreds of large and small labor camps sprang up. The labor camps became societies unto themselves, albeit with government-imposed rules and regulations.

For all the touted benefits of the PCA, the real challenge for the workers was getting off the government work teat. The only way off was a firm job offer from an accredited private sector company or a non-PCA government job. Unfortunately, you were damaged goods once you went to the work camps. Some thought the best option was to drop off the grid. If you could afford it. Some people could.

Then there was always black market unemployment. If you didn’t take government assistance you didn’t have to go to the work camps. So you bought this insurance and hoped you found a private sector job. It was like a rainy day fund you could borrow against. You paid it back when you got a job. If you didn’t get a job soon enough, you either went to the work camp or you disappeared.

I stopped getting calls from Esposito. He didn’t need me anymore. I didn’t need him either.

One day I read a news story about a minstrel messiah travelling through the PCA work camps preaching and singing for freedom. “Let my people go” was his slogan. A modern-day singing Moses. Someone needed to fight for freedom. I thought he might need some help. I thought I should find out. He was last seen in Tennessee. I went to look for him.

The pendulum was going to swing again. Extreme behaviors have a way of causing that to happen. What we needed was moderation and compromise, not extreme application of logic to extreme ideologies.

I had ridden the pendulum on the side of the machine and on the side of the cog. I was just that much more weight carrying the pendulum farther and farther to the extremes. I was part of the problem. This time I would step in front of the pendulum. I would slow it down. The minstrel and I would spread the word together. He had the message and I had the money. We would find common ground and we would stand on it. Together.

 

The End

Posted in Methane Wars | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Methane Wars: A Fable — Chapter Nineteen

Cliff Diving

good cow wordpress The cliff jumper was Senator Esposito from California. He argued that if we were going to make recipients of government assistance work for it then so should those on unemployment assistance work for it.

The opposition lashed back, arguing that this defeated the purpose of unemployment insurance, which was to allow the unemployed to survive while they search for another job. Support was lacking for a bill that seemed to penalize someone solely for the misfortune of having been laid off. The plan would not only hamper the job search of the unemployed but the job filling of the employers. Public backlash stopped the bill.

Jefferson sighed with relief but though Senator Esposito was rebuffed, he was not defeated. A few tweaks to the proposal, some rebranding of the bill and some time to let the furor pass and he was ready to try again. He called to see if I would still support him. I was lukewarm on the idea. Esposito was sorry to hear that, but not sorry enough to rethink his position.

Esposito’s Productive Citizen Bill: Everyone would be a productive member of society. That was the price for living in free country. You would be given six months of unemployment assistance while you looked for a new job. After six months if you hadn’t found a job, you had two options. You could simply choose to no longer receive unemployment assistance. Or you could continue to receive assistance and the government would find you a job. Everyone would work.

It could be compared fairly or unfairly to the PWA (Public Works Administration) of FDR and the New Deal. Esposito explained it as “a preemptive strike to a looming economic downturn by maximizing the workforce and maximizing the usefulness of federal tax monies.” And if it would not diminish the size of the welfare state and habitual dependence on government aid, it would at least get something in return. If the people wanted the government to be more accountable for the way they spent taxpayer money then the government would make the recipients of government aid more accountable. You had to go full circle. Esposito was appealing to those who wanted the government to be fiscally responsible and beneficent as well.

Esposito presented it as a logical extension of Jefferson’s personal accountability principal: from the people to the government and back to the people. Jefferson again felt painted into a corner by his own arguments. He argued for compromise, if only for a loosening of the guidelines. Jefferson pointed to the lack of support in the polls. The people did not want this.

But for Esposito compromise wasn’t necessary. He was emboldened by the simple power of his logic. This was for the greater good. He would commit political suicide if necessary. He had found the votes to pass the bill. Jefferson could veto it. It was possible the veto would hold. But Esposito was confident Jefferson would not veto it.

The bill passed. The act itself was more than a 1,000 pages long. Six month limits were placed on benefits. After that you worked for benefits. The limits were retroactive. Immediately tens of thousands of people were expected to go to work. To deal with this, the Productive Citizen Administration created a new department to coordinate the efforts of putting people to work.

The initial idea was to implement a bureaucracy similar to The Contract’s. The Contract’s structure was unfortunately limited mostly to community service efforts. The PCA needed to create constructive and productive jobs. The legislation had the foresight, buried in its 1,000 pages, to allocate the capital needed for large scale projects. But what projects?

Tens of thousands of people spread across the country with diverse skill sets. In small towns, in big cities. In prosperous regions, in hard hit regions. Who was to be put to work where and on what? Esposito formed a committee to identify the best projects.

In the meantime, what few openings that existed in the community service projects of The Contract were filled. Everyone else on the unemployment roll was giving a reprieve.

The committee to create projects was made up of CEOs of major corporations, governors, economic advisors and labor specialists. The first thing they did was break the task set before them into two parts: the projects and the skills.

What projects to choose quickly became an ideological battle: were these projects for the greater good like public works projects, (the Hoover Dam or the Federal Highway system), public service projects (forest rangers, community policing, daycare centers) or production efforts (making park benches, highway signs)?

Or were these projects to be more like new companies providing goods for sale? These companies could create goods with a competitive advantage. Or companies that could sell goods directly to the government and have an immediate and committed buyer. Would products be limited as so not to compete with current domestic production?

The second step was to identify who had what skills and where they were and then match that against the project list.

The Presidential Committee on Production came out with recommendations.

Public Works Project #1: Build four new high tech gasoline refining plants in key regions. One thousand qualified employees needed per site, plus professional and technical staff. Qualified workers would be relocated to government provided work camps near the construction sites.

Public Works Project #2: Major flood protection and lock upgrades along the Mississippi from St. Paul to New Orleans. Five thousand workers needed, plus professional and technical staff. Qualified employees would be relocated to four work camps along the river at St. Paul, Des Moines, Memphis and New Orleans.

Other minor public works projects finished the public works list. Then came the public service projects.

The biggest project was to provide free public daycare in the top 100 metropolitan areas. No relocations needed. Plus more other minor public service projects.

The committee also established quasi-private companies to create goods for the federal government, like the Public Service Uniform Company. The company would provide uniforms to everyone performing public service. They would be manufactured for safety and durability and relieve financial burden on employees. Ten manufacturing facilities to be opened in key geographic regions. Three hundred workers per plant, plus professional and technical staff. Workers would be relocated to government-provided work camps.

Then there were the Tier Two Projects: projects that didn’t have enough skilled employees to perform the necessary work. Regional Training centers would be opened to train selected employees in the necessary skills to begin Tier Two Projects. The first Tier Two Project was Street Cleaning Equipment Company. Manufacturing plant to be opened in Tennessee. Training center would be opening while construction of plant occurred. Four hundred workers. Workers would be relocated to government work camps. Other Tier Two projects would be named later.

The case was made that this would be a huge economic boon. Unemployed people would be put to work. Thousands of civil servants would be needed to administer the PCA. Unemployment would drop to historic lows. Funds previously spent on unemployment would now have production attached to them. Society as a whole would be more efficient and productive. The USA would be more competitive in the world economy.

And yes, as unemployment dropped confidence in the economy began to increase and the economy began to grow again. Happy Days were here again.

Posted in Methane Wars | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Musings on Laughing

eyes2aLook, look, look.
I look but I don’t see.

See, see, see.
I see but I don’t hear.

Hear, hear, hear.
I hear but I don’t laugh.

Laugh, Laugh, Laugh.
I laugh but I don’t understand

What I was looking on,
What I was listening to,
What I was seeking for.

I turned my eyes inside out
To see where I was looking from.

I turned my ears inside out
To hear what I was listening for.

I turned my laugh inside out
And saw why life is so funny.

Posted in poetry | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Methane Wars: A Fable — Chapter Eighteen

The Contract

good cow wordpressThen the welfare state met the drug user. The first debate around legal drug use came from California. The state and many cities began to argue over whether people who received government aid should be allowed to spend the money on legal drugs. The age-old debate of what products should and shouldn’t be allowed for purchase with government aid rang out.

The debate spread to state after state. Were they going to let the government purchase drugs, however legal they were? Where do you draw the line? Was there even a line?

Timothy Jefferson was silent on the topic. The Administration issued no statements. Rumor was that Jefferson was hoping the states would work it out. They didn’t work it out. They looked to the White House and said, “Hey, this is federal law. A little help?”

Jefferson told the states he would get back to them. He formed a focus group and headed off to Camp David. At first, it seemed that Jefferson saw this as a burden, but soon he found the opportunity in it. The states, the cities, the Feds were all looking to him for direction. And direction he would give them. To Jefferson it was simple. Everything fell into his creed of personal accountability. He knew he was responsible for the fiscal welfare of the country as well. How to balance these? He must get the most possible value out of the people’s money. You couldn’t do that by giving away money with little demand for return.

What was wanted here was a contract: a contract between the people and the people. Jefferson would offer a contract.

He offered this: “The people who receive government aid will provide community service. Based on an equitable wage for the service performed, you will work off seventy-five percent of your aid up to but not exceeding forty hours a week. If you cannot for good cause perform community service while you are receiving government aid, you will have up to twelve months to begin your community service. If in twelve months you do not begin community service, your aid will be cut off. In return, the aid given to you will not be subject to any expenditure rules. Your personal choices and freedoms will not be limited because you receive government aid. You are free to not sign the contract. Not signing the contract precludes you from receiving federal government aid. You may rescind your request for aid at any time and be relieved of community service commitments.”

The Contract would be offered on all Federal aid. Jefferson would not mandate that states follow this policy but any programs supplemented in any way by federal monies would be subject to The Contract. He recommended states and cities implement some version of The Contract.

Thirty-two states and hundreds of cities chose to implement The Contract for both federal and state aid. Everyone else either put no requirements on government aid or issued rules stating that government aid should or should not be spent on drugs.

The opposition cried foul. There were extenuating circumstances in many cases. Hardship had to be taken into account. Jefferson decreed that agencies were free to make documented exceptions.

Other critics warned of rampant drug use and rampant abuse of the system. Jefferson argued the Civic Accountability Boards would take care of abuse.

The courts agreed with Jefferson. The government was certainly allowed to place stipulations on aid that it handed out. It was a long and common practice.

Of course, if you were going to require community service, then you had to have someone administer community service. You had to have a lot more of it for people to do. A handful of people cleaning road sides wouldn’t cut it. Significant amount of public services could be handled with this newfound labor pool. Civil service unions cried foul. This would take jobs from civil servants. They sued to stop the law. The courts ruled that a government’s job was not to provide jobs and so could provide public services in what manner it saw fit.

You couldn’t choose what kind of skills came with your community service workers, so more general labor projects were needed. Non-vital service projects. Beautification projects became an easy choice: graffiti removal, gardening, cleaning and maintaining parks, etc.

Beliefs and arguments sprang up that the costs to manage the projects were higher than the benefits that came out of them. In some cases that may have been true. Jefferson argued that objection was missing the point. The point was to instill personal accountability into receiving government aid. It would encourage people to get off government aid. If they did not make an effort to get off government aid, then at least they would have to work for it.

Again, critics claimed it was a slippery slope. Nothing appeared to be out of reach of government control and stricture, from the innocuous divvying up of highway funds to provisioning of health care to providing of personal welfare. Government had always placed strings on things provided. The question was where did the breadth and depth of those strings stop.

Jefferson knew it was slippery. He began to edge away from the slope. But it was too late. One of his party members jumped off the cliff. Jefferson was obliged to follow.

Posted in Methane Wars | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Methane Wars: A Fable — Chapter Seventeen

good cow wordpress

Usage

Jefferson’s next crusade, whatever it might have been, was preempted. His personal accountability and freedom banner had been strangely taken up by the Freedom Five, some extreme members of the opposition party.

“Freedom of the Mind for the Mind” was the Freedom Five’s slogan. They latched onto Jefferson’s personal accountability mantra: the freedom to act and behave as you liked as long as your behavior did not infringe upon the rights of others. They were advocates for your mind, for your brain, for your choice. Specifically the choice to use mind-altering drugs. The Freedom Five wanted to legalize most drugs, including marijuana, cocaine, and heroin. They kept the list of drugs to naturally occurring drugs. Crystal Meth didn’t make the list. If I didn’t cause harm to someone while I was on drugs, then my doing drugs is not a problem. If I did harm someone while on drugs, I would be accountable for that. The Civic Accountability Board’s would take care of me.  They used Jefferson’s personal accountability logic adeptly.

The Freedom Five argued for legalization of drugs using personal freedom as a hammer and tax revenue as an anvil. The projected tax revenues were significant enough to be a big carrot to the states, not even including the decreased enforcement expenditures. That brought on board a slew of hesitant congressional members.

Senator Esposito had a lot of concerns about the spread of drug use. Yet the appeal of tax revenues in a state continually struggling with budget balancing was tempting. The public was fairly split on the topic. Esposito could go either way; determining which way would get him reelected was the tough call. I got a call from Esposito. Would I still support him if he voted in favor? I said yes. Keep the money flowing.

The political coup de gras came when the Freedom Five offered up state choice. Though there would be Federal guidelines and some regulation, the States would be able to choose to allow legal sale of drugs or not and set guidelines as long as they didn’t violate federal guidelines. That tipped the scales. Senator Esposito jumped on board along with many other congressional members. For Esposito the state control meant he could dump blame on the state if things went south.

Jefferson didn’t like it. He was against drug use. He liked it even less since his next crusade for personal accountability had been preempted. Now these hippies were going to pull one over on him. But he didn’t campaign against it. He had used the same argument to pass the Home Protection Act and the Darwin Laws. He wanted to use it again. The hypocrisy of opposing his own logic stopped him from opposing the bill.

The “Freedom of the Mind for the Mind” bill passed the two congressional houses. Jefferson made his symbolic political stand by not signing the law, but did not veto it. States acted swiftly. Special state legislative sessions were called. States created bureaucratic structures and regulations. Most importantly, tax collection systems were put in place. Tax revenue ruled.

The Ag industry jumped in immediately. Though still reeling from the repeal of the nationalized diet, plenty of farmers had not yet retooled and could shift to production of marijuana, the easiest plant to cultivate in the US. Other plants would take longer to cultivate and some weren’t feasible to be grown here. So the one caveat to state control was that the Feds would control import points for other drugs.

The states ran with state control. Beyond the basic need to be licensed to grow and sell, the options were wide open on how to regulate. Some states issued licenses and instituted quality checks. That was it. Others wanted more control. In some, you had to register to buy. Texas and North Dakota choose not to allow legal sale at all.

For most states, drug purchases would be tracked. You were good until you caused harm to another. Then your records would be checked. Your purchases would be taking into consideration. If you choose to take drugs that might compromise your ability to respects others’ freedoms, those choices could be held against you and your freedoms taken away. The Civic Accountability Boards would decide.

One state took this to a more universal interpretation of drugs: all legal drugs would fall into the category of tracking: alcohol, cigarettes, prescription medications. All legal drugs. If you transgressed while on these drugs, punishment could be harsh. You were branded an abuser. The Civic Accountability Board would take care of you.

Despite the mixed message of freedom and fear of punishment, retail stores popped up everywhere. Drug lounges opened, like the hash bars of Amsterdam. Tax revenues started to come in. Life was good for the states. Life was good for drug users.

There was outcry. Doomsday critics bellowed. Ease of access could lead to epidemic levels of drug addiction and abuse and social decline. However, it had happened yet. So the opposition’s argument degenerated into a hope they would be able to say I told you so.

The Freedom Five slipped one last amendment into their bill: amnesty for imprisoned drug offenders. If what you were in prison for what was now legal, then you should not still be in prison. You were free to go. Those convicted of violent crime were exempt from amnesty. Still, approximately 200,000 people were released from prison immediately.

Whether President Jefferson was aware of the provision is hard to say. He didn’t condemn the law. He just moved on. Or tried to.

Posted in Methane Wars | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Methane Wars: A Fable — Chapter Sixteen

good cow wordpress

The Darwin Law

“You are accountable for your actions, for your choices.” This was a call to arms from a political ad aimed at reintroducing personal accountability into society. It coincided with a high profile criminal case in which an alleged intruder had been injured on a booby trapped property. The booby trap had been installed in response to a rampant string of thefts. It became known as the Booby Trap Justice case.

The defendant was suing the property owner for the injuries sustained when he “accidently” stumbled onto the property. The property owner used surveillance video to show the defendant carrying goods towards the exit and behaving in ways that clearly dismissed the idea of accidental behavior. In the end the civil suit was dismissed and the defendant pleaded out.

Jefferson never let a good crisis go to waste. Jefferson felt the case should have never gone to trial at all, that the standards for burden of proof should have been much higher to even warrant a trial. This would be Jefferson’s first crusade. Property rights. Self-defense. A man’s home is his castle. The right to not be sued for protecting yourself.

If you unlawfully entered someone’s home, you had already broken the Jeffersonian Personal Accountability code. You had made a choice. And if that choice caused you to be beaten, shot or killed, then then that was price that came with personal accountability. There was no one else who could shoulder the burden of that choice.

A month after the Booby Trap Justice case was settled, a bill was introduced into the House by way of the White House: the Right to Protect Freedom Bill. The bill reiterated the rights of people to defend their property from invasion. The burden was placed on the alleged intruder to prove any personal injury was malicious on the part of the property owner. But it more importantly stated what rights the invader forfeited when he or she chose to invade. Personal accountability. You forfeited your rights when you chose to step over that line. You were now accountable for the repercussions. The burden was placed on you, the invader, if you survived to prove that the invasion was an accident, a mistake or a setup. If you could prove intent, then that was on the property owner for a breakdown in personal accountability.

Senator Esposito was on board. Esposito’s chief of staff called to see if I could support this. I said yes. I could not argue with making you accountable for your choices. Not sure my support really made any difference. I presume the call was made to ensure my money kept flowing.

The bill passed with small but vocal opposition in the House and Senate. Jefferson’s political capital did its job. Jefferson had so much political capital he had plenty left to launch his second crusade: Accountability outside the castle.

The next crusade was what you would call personal liability reform. You were accountable, and by association, liable for your actions. If I did something that caused harm to you, whether through intention or through carelessness, then I was accountable and therefore liable for that harm. Jefferson took the notion a step further. If I did something careless that caused you to harm me that was on me too. I am accountable for my mistakes, not you. If I crossed the street where I should not cross and you ran into me with your car, that carelessness was on me.

Jefferson’s opponents called it the Darwin Law: survival of the fittest. No mistake, however innocent, human or accidental, would go unpunished. His opponents argued the slipperiness of the slope.

Jefferson countered the slippery slope argument with a compromise: Civic Accountability Boards. CABs would be populated with citizens chosen like a jury. Chosen citizens would serve a one-year term. Any civil or criminal case could be brought forward to be presented to the board. The CAB would deliberate and determine if Jefferson’s accountability code came into play. If accountability came into play, they would assign accountability. Accountability by a jury of your peers.

Jefferson’s political momentum was a tsunami. The bill was introduced and passed.

Posted in Methane Wars | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Methane Wars: A Fable — Chapter Fifteen

good cow wordpress

Repeal

The old guard was in flames. The only thing that slowed the conflagration was the two months until the inauguration. It would be hard to argue that Jefferson didn’t have a mandate. You could argue with him, but he knew and that’s all that mattered. Senator Esposito was on board with Jefferson and his quest for personal freedoms. I was on board with Esposito. If the money I threw at Esposito’s campaign didn’t buy me influence it certainly bought me inclusion.

The first hundred days were scripted out. Inauguration Day was hyped up as a symbolic start to the wave of change. Immediately after the swearing in, Jefferson walked to the Capital, his party members from the House and Senate in tow. They introduced a bill to repeal the entire Coal Elimination Act. Both houses of Congress passed it. There was no debate. Jefferson signed it.

An entire, massive bureaucratic government structure came crashing down. FemCad was dissolved. The Green Caps were dissolved. Felonies were removed from the books. Meisner’s propaganda machine was dismissed. The atmosphere of the entire country changed. Parties and celebrations occurred everywhere. Methane collection units were burned in massive piles. Sweet release.

The un-nationalization of supermarkets and the food supply was a little trickier to dismantle. It would take time to literally replant for the new market. To ease the strain Jefferson opened up the import market to bring back much needed and desired diversity to the food market.

The repeal did not come without heartburn. The biggest pain that came from the repeal was the 100,000-plus jobs that were eliminated. Even I lost my job, though I hadn’t needed it for a long time. Unemployment was available to the workers but the economy still took a hit. Even the drug traffickers took a hit. Alvarez and his gangs had nothing to offer. Their reason for being was wiped away with the stroke of a pen. Back to selling real, good old-fashioned illegal drugs.

The energy sector of the economy had to re-tool as well. Not enough methane supplies were available to power all the new methane equipment that had been built. The price of methane available skyrocketed. Replacement of methane took time. Roving energy outages occurred.

The economy survived thanks to a renewal of tourism. For six years tourism to the US had ground to a halt thanks to the travel requirements of the Coal Elimination Act. If you were visiting, you had to wear a methane collection unit. Only foreign dignitaries were exempted, a rather far stretching application of diplomatic immunity. Tourism was back and the influx of foreign cash propped up the economy.

The repeal was a huge success by any standard. Jefferson’s party now had huge stockpiles of political capital. Capital that had to be spent. Jefferson’s challenge was that the party had solely run on the repeal of methane collection. There was no other platform. So Jefferson turned to his real passion: personal accountability.

Jefferson believed personal accountability was hard. You had to work at it and for it. You had to man up, if you will. But because it was hard it also had a reward: personal freedom. The freedom to act and behave as you liked as long as your behavior did not infringe upon the rights of others. You were master of your domain as long as you didn’t harm others. For Jefferson these philosophies were tightly bound together. If you infringed on another’s rights or caused harm you owned up to it, you took accountability. This was the code that allowed these freedoms to exist, to mean something.

But sometimes people do not own up. That’s when the law steps in, but not until then. That’s how freedom worked. Your behaviors were your own. They were your own until you broke the code. The code was a big circle around you. It protected those inside it and those outside it. Jefferson was going to draw the line hard and bold.

Posted in Methane Wars | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

I Want to Build a Clock

clock1bI want to build a clock,
Tick, tick, tock.
A monument to passing moments
Mounted on a mirror so
Time can reflect upon itself.

I want to build a clock,
Tick, Tock, tock,
A sculpture to the passing seconds
Strung from a stone disc so
Time can cower under its weight.

I want to build a clock,
Tock, Tock, Tock,
A legacy to the lingering now
Lacquered in Clear Lucite so
Time can stand still and be pondered.

Posted in poetry | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Methane Wars: A Fable — Chapter Fourteen

good cow wordpress

The Swing

Timothy Jefferson was fatefully named, or so he would tell you. I suspect he wished his parents had been more prescient and named him Thomas but the T was close enough.

Jefferson was the leading candidate facing President Taylor. Foodem Fighters were going to be his meal ticket. They just needed organization and some talking points. Timothy Jefferson had talking points and the party could buy organization.

Soon the Foodem Fighters weren’t just protesting. They were rallying. Speakers. Motions. Demands. The message, I suspect with help of Jefferson’s political machine, began to evolve. The desire to choose their food might have driven them to this point but soon they recognized lack of food freedom was just a symptom of their greater lack of freedom. If the strictures of Methane Collection were the problem, repealing the Coal Elimination Act was the solution. Since Methane Collection affected everyone, the rallying cry of repeal rang clear and far.

Meisner tried to counter the swell with patriotic arguments: “Repealing Methane Collection doesn’t fix our basic national problem. It only relieves a burden that is sure to come to an end soon.” Doomsday arguments: “The burdens of methane collection will pale next to the burdens of failed energy resources.” Fear as a political motivator. The collapse of civilization provided a good counterpoint. And there it was: doomsday vs. personal freedom.

Timothy Jefferson interpreted Methane Collection as an abuse of government control, regulation of the people beyond its appointed power. He didn’t believe in the doomsday scenario. But he even more vehemently believed that it was never justified for the government to oppress its people. By the people. For the people. He believed it was time to roll back government restrictions on the ability to choose.

In the war of words, Jefferson had the upper hand. He could on a daily basis illustrate the personal effects of Methane Collection. Meisner could only back up his doomsday speech with economic projections that, no matter how dire, lacked visceral and immediate impact. The economy was just fine. Energy was not scarce. Jobs were not being lost. People wanted freedom, not fear.

Jefferson had big plans for reigning in regulation. What we needed was less government babysitting and more personal accountability. Jefferson loved personal accountability. More personal accountability solved almost everything for Jefferson. Though he spoke frequently about personal accountability in his stump speech he stuck to the repeal of Methane Collection as his bread and butter. That was personal. Hard hitting. Explosive. Oppression brought angrily home was a powder keg.

House and Senate candidates from Jefferson’s party grabbed onto the firestorm Jefferson and the Foodem Fighters had ignited. I watched as the fury grew. Someone had to pay for the indignities of Methane Collection. The President and his party would pay. Jefferson fueled every demand from the Foodem Fighters with an inflammatory speech. “You are being violated on daily basis. You have been dehumanized, turned into an energy source, a commodity.” The incendiary anger of oppression was poured on every issue. The actions of the President’s party were ablaze.

I jumped into the fray. I wanted an end to the Methane Collection. That was freedom to me. I had money. I threw it at a senate candidate from California, Dale Esposito. Not sure that the money mattered in the end. The pendulum swung and it swung hard. Landslide. Out with the old, in with the new. The bell tolled hard for President Taylor and his party.

Timothy Jefferson won the presidency. His party took back the House with a full majority. Jefferson’s party won every Senate race.

Posted in Methane Wars | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Diamond and the Damned

diamonddamnedThe Diamond and the Damned

One ring may rule them all
But two will bind us together.

Commitments hard as diamonds,
Bound to an infallible ideal designed
To reflect change and weather sieges,
Daily remind us of choices made that
Cannot be unmade.

Remind us that choices bow to the commitment
And commitment bows to the ideal.

Ideal hard as diamonds,
Opaque walls that muffle sight and
Sound, warnings and calls,
Cannot be scratched or breached
But can perhaps be broken.

Free will as hard as diamonds,
Last resource of the damned
Refuge of evolution,
Hides beneath the ring and
Waits for the hammer on the anvil.

Posted in poetry | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment